Teaching replenishment literacy without drowning teams in math

We anchor each module to three live SKUs the cohort selects on day one. Every formula references those SKUs by name, which keeps abstract symbols grounded. Rubrics score assumptions on clarity, evidence, and humility. Humility sounds soft, yet it is the difference between a brittle parameter set and one that survives the next supplier delay. We also rotate facilitators mid-week so teams hear different questioning styles. That variation exposes blind spots a single voice might miss. Finally, we leave behind facilitator notes in English with Korean margin comments so regional offices can localise examples without rewriting the entire deck.